|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 175-181
Quinacrine enhances temozolomide cytotoxicity in temozolomide-sensitive and -resistant glioblastoma cells
Pingde Zhang, Ning Li, Karrie Mei Yee Kiang, Zhiyuan Zhu, Gloria Wai Man Leung, Stephen Yin Cheng, Gilberto Ka Kit Leung
Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
|Date of Web Publication||25-Oct-2018|
Prof. Gilberto Ka Kit Leung
Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: The alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) is widely used in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) therapy. Unfortunately, TMZ-resistance frequently occurs in recurrent GBM and is the major cause of treatment failure. The anti-malarial drug quinacrine (QC) harbors antitumor and chemosensitivity properties, but its interactions with TMZ in GBM remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether QC would sensitize TMZ in TMZ-sensitive and TMZ-resistant GBM cells as well as the underlying mechanisms. Materials and Methods: The cytotoxicity of QC and TMZ in TMZ-sensitive and TMZ-resistant GBM cells was evaluated using in vitro cell viability assay and colony formation assay. Cellular apoptosis and protein expression levels were determined using TUNEL assay and immunoblotting, respectively. Results: QC substantially enhanced TMZ cytotoxicity in both TMZ-sensitive and TMZ-resistant cells. Such cytotoxic effect was accompanied by changes in the expression levels of LC3II, p62 and cleaved caspase 3, and increased cellular apoptosis. The results suggested that QC could sensitize GBM cells to TMZ at least partially through apoptosis induction, in which autophagy inhibition might be involved. Conclusion: The antimalarial drug QC may hold promise as a potentiation of TMZ treatment in GBM, especially in cases of TMZ-resistance.
Keywords: Apoptosis, autophagy, glioblastoma multiforme, quinacrine, temozolomide
|How to cite this article:|
Zhang P, Li N, Kiang KM, Zhu Z, Leung GW, Cheng SY, Leung GK. Quinacrine enhances temozolomide cytotoxicity in temozolomide-sensitive and -resistant glioblastoma cells. Glioma 2018;1:175-81
|How to cite this URL:|
Zhang P, Li N, Kiang KM, Zhu Z, Leung GW, Cheng SY, Leung GK. Quinacrine enhances temozolomide cytotoxicity in temozolomide-sensitive and -resistant glioblastoma cells. Glioma [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Nov 28];1:175-81. Available from: http://www.jglioma.com/text.asp?2018/1/5/175/244195
| Introduction|| |
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most lethal primary brain tumors in adults. Despite standard therapy consisting of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, patient prognosis remains poor. The median survival is around 15 months after diagnosis. Resistance to the commonly used chemotherapeutic drug temozolomide (TMZ) in primary and recurrent GBM patients is a major cause of treatment failure. The development of new strategies to overcome TMZ-resistance is urgently needed to improve the prognosis of GBM patient.
The alkylating agent TMZ acts by methylating DNA at different positions to form DNA adducts. In particular, the formation of O6-methylguanine lesion is the most important effect that accounts for TMZ's therapeutic benefit. TMZ-induced DNA adducts interfere with DNA replication and consequently trigger apoptosis, autophagy, senescence and possibly other cellular responses., However, TMZ-induced autophagy may prevent cell death by suppressing apoptosis and activating senescence, while the inhibition of autophagy has been shown to enhance TMZ-induced apoptosis in GBM., The previous study revealed that autophagy inhibition by a natural compound would sensitize GBM cells to TMZ. These findings suggest that agents and/or factors targeting autophagy may be an effective strategy for promoting the therapeutic efficacy of TMZ.
Recently, the autophagy inhibitor quinacrine (QC) has attracted attention as a potential agent to overcome TMZ-resistance. QC is widely used as an antimalarial drug with proven records of patient tolerance and clinical safety. Furthermore, available evidence also suggests that QC may have anticancer and chemosensitizing properties.,, In glioma cells, it has been reported that QC significantly inhibited cell proliferation, and increased the anticancer effect of cediranib, an inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase receptor. However, the effect of QC when used in combination with TMZ remains unexplored. This study aimed to investigate whether and how QC could enhance TMZ cytotoxicity in both TMZ-sensitive and TMZ-resistant GBM cells. Our findings demonstrated that QC might be a potential chemosensitizer of TMZ in GBM cells though at least partially apoptosis induction.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Human GBM cell lines U87 and U251 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) and TMZ-resistant U87-R and U251-R cell lines were maintained in MEMα medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Gibco, USA). All cells were cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidity incubator.
TMZ-resistant cell lines U87-R and U251-R were established by treating the parental U87 and U251 cells with a very low dose of TMZ at the beginning, then gradually increasing the doses very 2 weeks with >10 months treatment. The IC50 of TMZ-resistant cell lines were assessed using Thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma, USA) assay.
Reagents and antibodies
TMZ was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma, USA) at a concentration of 10 mM. QC was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and dissolved in Milli-Q water at a concentration of 5 mM. Antibodies against LC3, p62, caspase 3, cleaved caspase 3 and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA).
Cell viability assay
Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay. Briefly, cells were seeded in triplicates on 96-well plates at 5 × 103 cells per well and treated with different concentrations of TMZ and/or QC on the next day. At the end of 72 h of treatment, MTT reagent was added to each well for 3 h of incubation. The supernatants were gently aspirated, and the formazan crystals were dissolved in DMSO. Cell viability was measured at 590 nm absorbance with Thermo Varioskan Flash Reader.
Cells were seeded on 6-well plates in triplicates at a concentration of 500 cells per well. Next day, the cells were treated with QC and/or TMZ. After 8–12 days of incubation, cells were fixed by 75% ethanol for 30 min and then stained by 0.5% crystal violet for 30 min. The number of colonies was determined under a microscopy. Only colonies consisting of at least 50 cells were counted.
TdT-mediated dUTP-X nick end labeling assay
Cells were seeded on coverslips on 6-well plates 1 day before treatment with QC and/or TMZ. Apoptotic cells were assessed using in situ cell death detection kit (Roche, USA). Briefly, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 1 h, and then incubated in freshly prepared permeabilization solution (0.1% Triton X-100 diluted in 0.1% sodium citrate) on ice for 2–5 min. Then, 50 μL of the TdT-mediated dUTP-X nick end labeling (TUNEL) mixture (mixing enzyme solution with label solution [1:9]) was directly added to the coverslips and incubated in cell culture incubator for 1 h. Finally, DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Thermo, USA) in mount solution was used to stain cell nuclei. Apoptotic cells were visualized and counted under fluorescence microscopy.
Cells were lysed in radio immunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Total cell lysates were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membrane was blocked in nonfat milk and then incubated with a primary antibody (for LC3II, p62, or cleaved caspase 3) at 4°C overnight. After washing thrice, the membrane was incubated with HRP-linked secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. Protein bands were detected with chemiluminescent reagents (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and then exposed to X-ray film.
The software SPSS 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data. Student's t-test was used to evaluate the difference between groups. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
Quinacrine is cytotoxic in both temozolomide-sensitive and temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma multiforme cells
Before investigating the effect of QC on GBM cells, we examined the resistance of U87-R and U251-R cells to TMZ using MTT assay. As shown in [Figure 1], on exposure to different concentrations of TMZ (from 62.5 to 2000 μM), the number of viable cells in the U87-R and U251-R lines was significantly increased as compared to that in the paired TMZ-sensitive U87-S and U251-S cells, respectively. The IC50 values of U87-R and U251-R cells were 1314 μM and 707.9 μM, compared to 361.6 μM and 156.8 μM in U87-S and U251-S cells, which represented a 3.6-fold and 4.5-fold increase, respectively. These results suggest that U87-R and U251-R cells were TMZ-resistant GBM cells.
|Figure 1: Temozolomide-resistant U87-R and U251-R glioblastoma multiforme cells. U87-S, U87-R (A) and U251-S, U251-R (B) were treated with temozolomide at concentrations of 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 μM for 72 h. Cell viability and the IC50 value were assessed using MTT assay|
Click here to view
Furthermore, to determine the cytotoxic effect of QC on both TMZ-sensitive and TMZ-resistant cells, MTT assay was used. As shown in [Figure 2], on QC treatment, the number of viable cells was obviously decreased in both TMZ-sensitive cells U87-S, U251-S and TMZ-resistant cells U87-R, U251-R in a dose-dependent manner. The rate of decrease in U87-R and U251-R cells was similar to their parental cells. Less than half of viable cells were observed after treatment with 10 μM QC in all these cells. These results indicated that QC had the same cytotoxic effect on TMZ-resistant as on TMZ-sensitive GBM cells.
|Figure 2: Quinacrine has cytotoxic effect on temozolomide-sensitive and temozolomide-resistant cells. U87-S, U87-R (A) and U251-S, U251-R (B) were treated with quinacrine at concentrations of 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, and 12.5 μM for 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using MTT assay|
Click here to view
Quinacrine enhances temozolomide cytotoxicity in both temozolomide-sensitive and temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma multiforme cells
Next, we evaluated the cytotoxic effect of QC in combination with TMZ using MTT assay with short-term culture time, and clonogenic assay with long-term culture time. We found that QC significantly enhanced the cytotoxic effect of TMZ in both TMZ-sensitive cells (U87-S, U251-S) and TMZ-resistant cells (U87-R, U251-R). On MTT assay, 250 μM TMZ only reduced the survival of U87-S and U87-R cells to 60% and 80%. The addition of 4 μM QC further decreased the number of viable cells to 40% and 60%, respectively [Figure 3]A and [Figure 3]B; Similarly, 250 μM TMZ treatment led to 40% U251-S and 80% U251-R cell survival as compared to the control, whereas 4 μM QC in combination with 250 μM TMZ further decreased the number of viable cells to 30% and 40%, respectively [Figure 3]C and [Figure 3]D. On clonogenic assay, the clonogenic survival was significantly decreased by combined QC and TMZ treatment when compared with QC or TMZ treatment alone in the two paired cell lines [Figure 4]. For example, 50 μM TMZ reduced the survival clones of U87-S and U87-R cells to 60% and 90%. The addition of 0.5 μM QC further decreased the survival clones to 40% and 65%, respectively. These results suggested that QC could significantly enhance the efficacy of TMZ treatment in both TMZ-sensitive and in TMZ-resistant GBM cells.
|Figure 3: Quinacrine is an effective chemosensitizer of temozolomide in both temozolomide-sensitive and temozolomide-resistant cells. U87-S (A) and U87-R (B), U251-S (C), and U251-R (D) cells were treated with quinacrine at concentrations of 4 or 8 μM and/or in combination with different concentrations (62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 μM) of temozolomide for 72 h. Cell viability were detected by MTT assay. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test and represented the mean ± standard deviation; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Quinacrine increases temozolomide efficay in both temozolomide-sensitive and temozolomide-resistant cells. U87-S (A) and U87-R (B), U251-S (C), and U251-R (D) cells were treated with 0.5 μM QC and/or 50 or 100 μM temozolomide for 10–14 days. Survival clones were determined under a microscope. Data were analyzed by Student's t-test and represented the mean ± standard deviation; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01|
Click here to view
Quinacrine increases temozolomide-induced apoptosis in both temozolomide-sensitive and temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma multiforme cells
We next explored the potential mechanisms of QC's action. QC is a late-stage autophagy inhibitor.,,, During autophagy, LC3I is conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine to form LC3II. LC3II is recruited to autophagosomal membranes and degraded after the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. P62, an LC3-binding protein, is downregulated by activating autophagy flux. In general, when the degradation of autophagosome is blocked, an accumulation of LC3II and p62 expressions would occur.,, To confirm whether QC could interfere with cellular autophagy in our model, the autophagy markers of LC3I/II and p62 were assessed. Cells were exposed to QC and/or TMZ, and immunoblotting was performed to detect LC3II and p62 expression levels. As expected, QC upregulated both LC3II and p62 expressions [Figure 5]E and [Figure 5]F, indicating autophagosome accumulation and the inhibition of autophagy on QC treatment.
|Figure 5: Quinacrine significantly enhances temozolomide chemosensitivity through apoptosis induction. U87-S (A), U87-R (B), and U251-S (C), U251-R (D) cells were treated with 10 μM QC with or without 500 μM temozolomide for 48 h. Apoptotic cells were detected by TUNEL assay. Data were analyzed by Student's t-test and all graphs show the mean ± standard deviation; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01. U87-S and U87-R (E), U251-S and U251-R (F) cells were treated with 5 (Q5) or 10 μM (Q10) quinacrine with or without 500 μM temozolomide (T500) for 48 h. Protein expressions were determined by immunoblotting|
Click here to view
Apoptosis is an important mechanism of cell death in GBM. We investigated whether the elevated cytotoxicity of TMZ when used in combination with QC in the two paired cell lines (U87-S and U87-R; U251-S, and U251-R) was due to apoptosis induction. Our results showed that QC plus TMZ upregulated the Bax and cleaved caspase 3 expression levels compared to treatment with QC or TMZ alone in all four cell lines [Figure 5]E and [Figure 5]F, suggesting that cellular apoptosis could be increased by the combinational treatment. To further confirm the effect of apoptosis induction, TUNEL assay was performed. As shown in [Figure 5]A, [Figure 5]B, [Figure 5]C, [Figure 5]D, QC plus TMZ significantly elevated cellular apoptosis in both TMZ-sensitive and TMZ-resistant cells as compared to QC or TMZ alone. For example, more than 25% of U87-R [Figure 5]B and U251-R [Figure 5]D cells were TUNEL-positive with the combinatorial treatment which was significantly higher than that treated with QC or TMZ alone (<10% TUNEL-positivity). Taking together, our results suggested that QC could enhance TMZ-induced apoptosis in GBM cells.
| Discussion|| |
Acquired TMZ-resistance is an important factor accounting for the poor prognosis of GBM patients. TMZ-induced autophagy has been shown, in addition to other known mechanisms such as DNA repair system, and the mismatch-repair response, to play an important role in the development of TMZ-resistance., QC acts as an inhibitor of autophagy and has antitumor activities.,, In this study, we investigated the effect of QC in combination with TMZ on TMZ-sensitive and TMZ-resistant GBM cells.
The antitumor activities of QC have already been identified in several cancers.,, QC could enhance chemosensitivity in both chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells. In several colorectal cancer cells, QC could act synergistically with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents., QC also enhanced the sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma to several chemotherapeutic agents, except for TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand). Golden et al. found that several antimalarial drugs including QC may exert cytotoxic effects on glioma cells including those that exhibited high degrees of chemoresistance. In addition, QC could significantly enhance cediranib efficacy in glioma both in vitro and in vivo. Our results demonstrated that QC could substantially promote TMZ cytotoxicity, even in cells that are highly resistant to TMZ, indicating that this time-honored antimalarial drug, when used in combination with TMZ, could provide a promising therapeutic strategy for GBM including treatment-naïve lesions with intrinsic TMZ-resistance and recurrent cases with de novo TMZ-resistance.
In terms of mechanism of action, we found that QC may act, at least partially, through the induction of apoptosis. Previous studies showed that QC-induced cancer cell death was mostly due to cellular apoptosis in, for example, colorectal cancer,, ovarian cancer, breast cancer,, and gastric cancer. In addition, QC could enhance the efficacy of factors such as suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), TRAIL,, and cediranib through apoptosis induction. In agreement with these findings, our results further demonstrated that QC could enhance TMZ efficacy through apoptosis induction in GBM cells.
Although QC functions as an autophagy inhibitor, whether QC-induced apoptosis is indeed related to autophagy inhibition remains controversial. In colonic cancer cells, QC-induced apoptosis was found to be positively associated with the accumulation of autophagic vacuoles and increased LC3II expression. Moreover, QC also sensitized ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin in an autophagy-dependent manner. However, in nonsmall-cell lung cancer, QC-induced apoptosis was probably independent of autophagy inhibition. Our results suggested that in glioma cells, QC could block autophagy and that may account for the increase in apoptosis following combinatorial treatment with TMZ, but further investigations are needed.
In conclusion, our preliminary study demonstrated that QC could sensitize GBM cells to TMZ, possibly through apoptosis induction and the inhibition of autophagy. Given that QC is a clinically accessible, safe, and well-tolerated drug, its potential role in GBM treatment warrants further translational and clinical investigations. Future studies may focus on the appropriate treatment window and dosing regimen as well as QC's potential interactions with radiotherapy and TMZ rechallenge.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study was supported by the funding provided by the Tsang Wing-Hing Endowed Professorship in Clinical Neuroscience, The University of Hong Kong.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, et al.
Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:459-66.
Knizhnik AV, Roos WP, Nikolova T, Quiros S, Tomaszowski KH, Christmann M, et al.
Survival and death strategies in glioma cells: Autophagy, senescence and apoptosis triggered by a single type of temozolomide-induced DNA damage. PLoS One 2013;8:e55665.
Ramirez YP, Weatherbee JL, Wheelhouse RT, Ross AH. Glioblastoma multiforme therapy and mechanisms of resistance. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2013;6:1475-506.
Lin CJ, Lee CC, Shih YL, Lin TY, Wang SH, Lin YF, et al.
Resveratrol enhances the therapeutic effect of temozolomide against malignant glioma in vitro
and in vivo
by inhibiting autophagy. Free Radic Biol Med 2012;52:377-91.
Zanotto-Filho A, Braganhol E, Klafke K, Figueiró F, Terra SR, Paludo FJ, et al.
Autophagy inhibition improves the efficacy of curcumin/temozolomide combination therapy in glioblastomas. Cancer Lett 2015;358:220-31.
Zhang P, Sun S, Li N, Ho AS, Kiang KM, Zhang X, et al.
Rutin increases the cytotoxicity of temozolomide in glioblastoma via autophagy inhibition. J Neurooncol 2017;132:393-400.
Khurana A, Roy D, Kalogera E, Mondal S, Wen X, He X, et al.
Quinacrine promotes autophagic cell death and chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer and attenuates tumor growth. Oncotarget 2015;6:36354-69.
Gallant JN, Allen JE, Smith CD, Dicker DT, Wang W, Dolloff NG, et al.
Quinacrine synergizes with 5-fluorouracil and other therapies in colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2011;12:239-51.
Wang W, Gallant JN, Katz SI, Dolloff NG, Smith CD, Abdulghani J, et al.
Quinacrine sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to TRAIL and chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer Biol Ther 2011;12:229-38.
Golden EB, Cho HY, Hofman FM, Louie SG, Schönthal AH, Chen TC, et al.
Quinoline-based antimalarial drugs: A novel class of autophagy inhibitors. Neurosurg Focus 2015;38:E12.
Lobo MR, Green SC, Schabel MC, Gillespie GY, Woltjer RL, Pike MM, et al.
Quinacrine synergistically enhances the antivascular and antitumor efficacy of cediranib in intracranial mouse glioma. Neuro Oncol 2013;15:1673-83.
Parks A, Charest-Morin X, Boivin-Welch M, Bouthillier J, Marceau F. Autophagic flux inhibition and lysosomogenesis ensuing cellular capture and retention of the cationic drug quinacrine in murine models. Peer J 2015;3:e1314.
Marceau F, Bawolak MT, Bouthillier J, Morissette G. Vacuolar ATPase-mediated cellular concentration and retention of quinacrine: A model for the distribution of lipophilic cationic drugs to autophagic vacuoles. Drug Metab Dispos 2009;37:2271-4.
Salas E, Roy S, Marsh T, Rubin B, Debnath J. Oxidative pentose phosphate pathway inhibition is a key determinant of antimalarial induced cancer cell death. Oncogene 2016;35:2913-22.
Tanida I, Waguri S. Measurement of autophagy in cells and tissues. Methods Mol Biol 2010;648:193-214.
Liu WJ, Ye L, Huang WF, Guo LJ, Xu ZG, Wu HL, et al.
P62 links the autophagy pathway and the ubiqutin-proteasome system upon ubiquitinated protein degradation. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2016;21:29.
Pugsley HR. Assessing autophagic flux by measuring LC3, p62, and LAMP1 co-localization using multispectral imaging flow cytometry. J Vis Exp 2017. doi:10.3791/55637.
Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, et al.
MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:997-1003.
Hegi ME, Liu L, Herman JG, Stupp R, Wick W, Weller M, et al.
Correlation of O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation with clinical outcomes in glioblastoma and clinical strategies to modulate MGMT activity. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4189-99.
Cahill DP, Levine KK, Betensky RA, Codd PJ, Romany CA, Reavie LB, et al.
Loss of the mismatch repair protein MSH6 in human glioblastomas is associated with tumor progression during temozolomide treatment. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:2038-45.
Hunter C, Smith R, Cahill DP, Stephens P, Stevens C, Teague J, et al.
Ahypermutation phenotype and somatic MSH6 mutations in recurrent human malignant gliomas after alkylator chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2006;66:3987-91.
Yan H, Bian A, Gao X, Li H, Chen Z, Liu X, et al.
Novel applications for an established antimalarial drug: Tumoricidal activity of quinacrine. Future Oncol 2018;14:1511-20.
Preet R, Mohapatra P, Mohanty S, Sahu SK, Choudhuri T, Wyatt MD, et al.
Quinacrine has anticancer activity in breast cancer cells through inhibition of topoisomerase activity. Int J Cancer 2012;130:1660-70.
Jani TS, DeVecchio J, Mazumdar T, Agyeman A, Houghton JA. Inhibition of NF-kappaB signaling by quinacrine is cytotoxic to human colon carcinoma cell lines and is synergistic in combination with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) or oxaliplatin. J Biol Chem 2010;285:19162-72.
Lobo MR, Wang X, Gillespie GY, Woltjer RL, Pike MM. Combined efficacy of cediranib and quinacrine in glioma is enhanced by hypoxia and causally linked to autophagic vacuole accumulation. PLoS One 2014;9:e114110.
Mohapatra P, Preet R, Das D, Satapathy SR, Choudhuri T, Wyatt MD, et al.
Quinacrine-mediated autophagy and apoptosis in colon cancer cells is through a p53- and p21-dependent mechanism. Oncol Res 2012;20:81-91.
Siddharth S, Nayak D, Nayak A, Das S, Kundu CN. ABT-888 and quinacrine induced apoptosis in metastatic breast cancer stem cells by inhibiting base excision repair via adenomatous polyposis coli. DNA Repair (Amst) 2016;45:44-55.
Wu X, Wang Y, Wang H, Wang Q, Wang L, Miao J, et al.
Quinacrine inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in human gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2012;73:52-64.
Zhu S, Chen Z, Wang L, Peng D, Belkhiri A, Lockhart AC, et al.
Acombination of SAHA and quinacrine is effective in inducing cancer cell death in upper gastrointestinal cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:1905-16.
Erkoc P, Cingöz A, Onder TB, Kizilel S. Quinacrine mediated sensitization of glioblastoma (GBM) cells to TRAIL through MMP-sensitive PEG hydrogel carriers. Macromol Biosci 2017. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201600267.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
|This article has been cited by|
||Repurposing of Anti-Malarial Drug Quinacrine for Cancer Treatment: A Review
| ||Makhan Kumar, Angshuman Sarkar |
| ||Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2022; 90(1): 12 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Quinacrine-CASIN combination overcomes chemoresistance in human acute lymphoid leukemia
| ||Limei Wu, Srinivas Chatla, Qiqi Lin, Fabliha Ahmed Chowdhury, Werner Geldenhuys, Wei Du |
| ||Nature Communications. 2021; 12(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Anti-Cancer Stem Cells Potentiality of an Anti-Malarial Agent Quinacrine: An Old Wine in a New Bottle
| ||Biswajit Das, Chanakya N. Kundu |
| ||Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. 2021; 21(4): 416 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Friend or Foe: Paradoxical Roles of Autophagy in Gliomagenesis
| ||Don Carlo Ramos Batara,Moon-Chang Choi,Hyeon-Uk Shin,Hyunggee Kim,Sung-Hak Kim |
| ||Cells. 2021; 10(6): 1411 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|